I named the title such after reading an article in msn.co.in quoting our very own great P.Chidambaram saying that he will not tolerate any further attack from Pakistan. I would like to ask if he really means it or would he be willing to give them a slight chance even. He goes on to say or rather call the Mumbai attacks as "the last game". Are you serious in calling it a game? Do you think the relatives of the victims who lost their lives there would think that they lost their lives while playing a game? I mean how insensitive can you really get. But even before getting to the insensitive part, do you mean that by saying that it is the last game we will now stop the efforts we were "supposed" to be taking for the Mumbai attacks. Like asking for the leaders of the terrorist organizations or demanding arrests on such terrorists. Is that what is implied?
Please do let us know what you do mean by calling it the last game.
And other point I had was did you think the American government gave Osama Bin Laden a last chance or call the "9/11" as the last game? I don't think so. George Bush did what any leader with some backbone will do (I can't believe I am calling him this), just attack the countries responsible for giving free boarding/lodging to the people behind the attacks. And in the process giving those countries their freedom is just a side effect. We could learn a thing or two from the way they responded/retaliated. There is a reason why the 9/11 is the last attack so far in the US. And there is a reason why we have people crossing the border as if they were just jumping a wall to escape from school.
I was boiling with anger after reading this article, but have now begun to see the comedy behind all this. Such is the leadership we have, so we should stop expecting anything.
Will update this with my thoughts as and when my anger goes down completely.
淘大象查排名
6 years ago